Privacy Commissioner’s Office Organises “Privacy-Friendly Awards 2025” Over 150 Organisations Receive Accolades in a Record-Breaking Year
|
Mr Clement WOO Kin-man, MH, JP, Under Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs (fourth from right), and Privacy Commissioner Ms Ada CHUNG Lai-ling, SBS (fourth from left), took a photo with members of the Personal Data (Privacy) Advisory Committee of the PCPD, the Hon Carmen KAN Wai-mun, JP (third from right), Mr Joseph LIN Ho-man, MH (second from left), and members of the Standing Committee on Technological Developments of the PCPD, Professor the Hon William WONG Kam-fai, MH (second from right), Ir Alex CHAN (first from right), Adjunct Professor Jason LAU (third from left) and Dr Alan CHEUNG (first from left).
|
Guests, judges and the PCPD’s representatives took a photo with the award-winning organisations.
|
The PCPD organised the “Privacy-Friendly Awards 2025” (Awards) Presentation Ceremony on 10 July to recognise the commitment and performance of 157 organisations, including enterprises, public and private organisations as well as government departments, in the protection of personal data privacy. The Awards Presentation Ceremony was held at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre, with the Under Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs, Mr Clement WOO Kin-man, MH, JP, officiating the event and delivering the opening address. Other officiating guests included members of the judging panel, the Hon Carmen KAN Wai-mun, JP, Adjunct Professor Jason LAU and the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited (HKIRC), Ir Wilson WONG Ka-wai. Besides, the PCPD’s Personal Data (Privacy) Advisory Committee member, Mr Joseph LIN Ho-man, MH, members of the Standing Committee on Technological Developments of the PCPD, including Professor the Hon William WONG Kam-fai, MH, Ir Alex CHAN and Dr Alan CHEUNG, and representatives of the supporting organisations, including Chairman of Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce, Ms Agnes CHAN Sui-kuen, BBS, and Chairperson of Property Management Services Authority, Dr James WONG Kong-tin, BBS, JP, also graced the ceremony with their presence and presented awards to the winners. The Awards this year, with the theme of “Safeguarding Data Security: Marching towards a New Digital Era”, recognised 157 organisations, setting a new record for the event. Among the awardees, 12 organisations were honoured with the Outstanding Gold Awards; 109 organisations won the Gold Awards; 28 organisations received the Silver Awards, and 8 organisations were presented with the Bronze Awards. In addition, three new special awards, namely the “Best AI Governance Award”, “Best Data Protection Officer Award” and “Best Data Breach Response Plan Award”, were introduced this year. Each special award was presented to three organisations, further highlighting the industry’s exceptional performance across various aspects of data governance.
Among the numerous awardees, 12 organisations received the Outstanding Gold Awards, including (in alphabetical order) AS Watson Group, Census and Statistics Department, Digital Policy Office, FWD Group Management Holdings Limited, Hong Kong Genome Institute, Huawei Services (Hong Kong) Co., Limited, Prudential General Insurance Hong Kong Limited, Swire Coca-Cola Limited, The Hong Kong Mortgage Corporation Limited, The Hongkong Electric Company, Limited, TOPPAN Edge (Hong Kong) Limited and ZA Bank Limited. For special awards, recipients of the “Best AI Governance Award” were Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited, FWD Group Management Holdings Limited and Swire Coca-Cola Limited. The “Best Data Protection Officer Award” was presented to Census and Statistics Department, FWD Group Management Holdings Limited and Swire Coca-Cola Limited. As for the “Best Data Breach Response Plan Award”, the awardees were Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Limited, Tencent Holdings Limited and The Hong Kong and China Gas Company Limited. Please click here for the opening speech of the Under Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs, Mr Clement WOO Kin-man, MH, JP (Chinese only). Please click here for the welcome address of Privacy Commissioner Ms Ada CHUNG Lai-ling, SBS (Chinese only). For the list of awardees and other details of the Awards, please visit the “Privacy-Friendly Awards 2025” webpage: https://www.pcpd.org.hk/privacyfriendlyawards/en/index.html
|
Privacy Commissioner’s Office Signs MOU with Personal Data Protection Bureau, Macao, to Jointly Propel High-Quality Development in the Greater Bay Area
|
Privacy Commissioner Ms Ada CHUNG Lai-ling (left) and the Director of the Macao PDPB, Mr Ken YANG Chongwei (right), signed a Memorandum of Understanding.
|
The PCPD and the Personal Data Protection Bureau, Macao (PDPB) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) earlier with a view to deepening collaboration and fostering exchange in the area of personal data privacy protection, and jointly propelling the digital economy and the high-quality development of Hong Kong, Macao and the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (Greater Bay Area).
Pursuant to the MOU, the scope of collaboration between the two data protection authorities includes the sharing of experiences and good practices in the areas of law enforcement, education and training, the joining of efforts to facilitate the safe and orderly cross-boundary flow of personal information within the Greater Bay Area, as well as the provision of mutual assistance in investigations and enforcement actions, etc.
|
Privacy Commissioner’s Office Intervenes in Eight Personal Data Security Incidents and Advocates Strengthening the Protection of Personal Data Privacy on All Fronts
|
Privacy Commissioner Ms Ada CHUNG Lai-ling (right) and the Assistant Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (Complaints & Criminal Investigation) Ms Rebecca HO Kan-yeuk (left) elaborated on eight data security incidents.
|
The PCPD earlier intervened in eight incidents relating to the disclosure and security of personal data involving organisations in various sectors. Owing to the deficiencies of the organisations in different aspects which resulted in the improper disclosure or unauthorised or accidental access, processing or use of personal data, the organisations in question were found to have contravened the relevant requirements of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO).
Summaries of the eight data security incidents (see Annex 1 for details)
1. After performing an ultrasound scan on the complainant, the doctor of a medical diagnostic centre did not log out of the system before leaving the examination room. As a result, the complainant who remained in the examination room was able to read the information of other patients displayed on the screen of the examination equipment, including the English names, the full Hong Kong Identity Card (HKID card) numbers and brief medical histories of the patients concerned. 2. A tour guide distributed group electronic flight tickets to tour members that contained the English names and dates of birth of over 30 individuals including the tour guide and all the tour members. As a result, the personal data of each tour member was made known to all tour members through the group electronic tickets. 3. When handling a complaint about parking matter, a security guard disclosed the complainant’s phone number to another carpark tenant to facilitate direct handling of the parking complaint between the two parties. This constituted improper disclosure of the complainant’s phone number to the other tenant. 4. A medical institution failed to properly apply the appropriate setting in the “View Summary of Responses” function during the collection of citizens’ personal data via an online registration form. As a result, the personal data of over 100 registrants, including their names in Chinese and English, phone numbers, email addresses and dates of birth, were accessible by other registrants using the “View Summary of Responses” function. 5. A government department posted a letter to the complainant. As the relevant staff member did not follow the established procedures in folding letters, the subject line of the letter and the case number comprising the complainant’s HKID card number were visible through the envelope window. 6. An insurance company printed documents on recycled papers and sent the documents to other companies. However, the papers used were obsolete resumes and HKID card copies, and this resulted in the personal data contained therein being wrongfully sent to other companies. 7. A retailer sent a promotional email to its members, but the responsible staff member mistakenly entered the email addresses of all members in the recipient field, resulting in the recipients being able to view the email addresses of over 1,000 members in the email. 8. Owing to a wrong script applied to the membership accounts system of an airline company, the complainant was erroneously directed to another customer’s account when he logged into his membership account. This enabled him to access the account information of the other customer. Data Protection Principle (DPP) 3(1) of Schedule 1 to the PDPO stipulates that personal data shall not, without the prescribed consent of the data subject (namely, express consent voluntarily given by the data subject), be used (including disclosed or transferred) for a new purpose, namely, any purpose other than the purpose for which the data was to be used at the time of collection of the data, or a purpose directly related to that purpose. DPP 4(1) of Schedule 1 to the PDPO stipulates that all practicable steps shall be taken to ensure that any personal data held by a data user should be protected against unauthorised or accidental access, processing, erasure, loss or use. In the above cases, having considered the circumstances of the individual incidents and the information obtained, Privacy Commissioner Ms Ada CHUNG Lai-ling found that the organisations had contravened DPP 3(1) of the PDPO concerning the use (including disclosure) of personal data or DPP 4(1) of the PDPO concerning the security of personal data. The Privacy Commissioner urges organisations to enhance their employees’ awareness of personal data privacy protection and to promote good work practices. Data security pitfalls may lie in any single procedure of work. To assist organisations in addressing the challenges relating to personal data security, the PCPD would like to make six recommendations to organisations of all sectors:- 1. Incorporate the protection of personal data privacy into the core values of the organisation, appoint appropriate managerial personnel to be responsible for data security, and publicly demonstrate the management’s commitment to protecting personal data privacy while enabling staff members to embrace the importance of personal data privacy; 2. Enhance the awareness and capabilities of employees to protect privacy through training, provide targeted training for employees according to their job functions, with a focus on explaining common risks and conducting scenario drills; 3. Develop clear and easy-to-understand work guidelines, design checklists or flowcharts to clearly communicate operational guidelines to employees based on the job natures of different positions, and reiterate relevant key points through emails, internal platforms or meetings on a regular basis; 4. Adopt technical security measures, such as using an email system that is encrypted by default or enabling auto-filling of correct email recipients to reduce the risk of errors; 5. Regularly monitor, assess and improve compliance with data security policy, including arranging supervisors to conduct regular or surprise inspections of frontline work, ensuring thorough implementation of the personal data security policy through monitoring and regularly collecting feedback from staff for continuous improvement of the policy; and 6. Develop a comprehensive data breach response plan to help the organisation swiftly respond to and effectively manage data breach incidents.
Please click here to refer to Annex 1.
|
|
|