Publications and Videos
2002-2003 Annual Report_17
|
Legal Notes on Appeal Cases lodged with the Administrative Appeals Board Under the PD(P)O, where the Privacy Commissioner has decided to exercise his power under section 39 to refuse to investigate or to continue to investigate a complaint brought before him, the complainant may appeal to the Administrative Appeals Board ("AAB") against such decision. Furthermore, where the Privacy Commissioner has completed an investigation, his decision not to issue an enforcement notice against the data user complained against may be the subject of an appeal to the AAB by the complainant. Alternatively, if as a result of an investigation, the Privacy Commissioner decides to issue an enforcement notice against the data user investigated, the data user may also appeal to the AAB against the enforcement notice so issued. There were in total 16 AAB appeal cases disposed of in the reporting period. Out of which, 7 cases were dismissed, 7 cases were struck out, 1 case was withdrawn and for the remaining one, the terms of the enforcement notice issued were varied. Case notes on some of the appeal cases are given below.
This was an appeal by a University against an enforcement notice issued by the Privacy Commissioner pursuant to section 50 of the PD(P)O. The complainant was a staff member of the University. She made two data access requests to the University. The first request was for access to her personal data from the Personnel Office and a Department of the University. In the second request, she sought access to all data including data that came to the possession of the University since her first request. In responding to her requests, the University provided 550 pages of documents to the complainant. Not satisfied with what she obtained, the complainant lodged a complaint with the PCPD alleging that the University had not provided her with all her personal data as requested in her data access requests. The PCPD carried out an investigation of the complaint and conducted a site investigation at the premises of the University. Having completed the investigation, the Privacy Commissioner found that the University failed to provide a copy of certain documents which, being personal data of the complainant, should have been given to the complainant in accordance with section 19(1) of the PD(P)O. To remedy the contravention, the Privacy Commissioner served an enforcement notice on the University directing it, amongst others, to:
The University appealed
to the AAB. The AAB decided that by imposing the requirement of conducting
a "thorough search", the Privacy Commissioner in effect placed
a higher burden on the data user than the statutory duty to exercise all
due diligence as required under
[Image of Previous Page][Image of image][Image of Table of Contents][Image of image][Image of Next Page] |
End of Page
[Annual Report] [Code of Practice/ Guideline & Explanatory Booklet] [Consultation Document/ Report] [Newsletter] [Guidance Note & Fact Sheet] [Leaflet & Form] [Opinion Survey] [Others] [Investigation Report / Inspection Report] [Information Book]
[About PCPD] [The
Ordinance] [PCPD Activities]
[Information Centre] [Privacy
Zone for Youngsters (Games)]
[Publications & Videos]
[Enquiries & Complaints]
[Case Notes] [Contact
Us] [Search] [Site
Directory] [Graphical Version]
[Chinese Version]
Notice/Copyright 2001 Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, Hong Kong. All rights reserved. Disclaimer