Information Centre

speeches and Articles

 
Date: July 13 - 15, 1998

Direct Marketing and Privacy Related to Personal Data (cont.)

Direct Marketing

Direct marketing is a booming business on a global basis, and Hong Kong is no exception. While the Hong Kong consumers are given, and many welcome the opportunities to choose a wide variety of services and products through direct marketing channels, there are also increasing negative sentiments regarding the invasion of privacy by "unsolicited personally addressed" mail, fax and phone messages.

There is a provision (Section 34) in the Ordinance which specifically relates to direct marketing. In essence, it requires a direct marketer to provide an opt-out clause in the direct marketing message the first time an individual is contacted, and to cease further contact with the individual if the individual chooses to opt-out.

The Commissioner is vested with the power to issue and approve codes of practice for data users for the purpose of providing practical guidance in respect of requirements under the Ordinance. Except in special circumstances, usually a relevant code of practice is developed by the recognised representative or regulatory body of a profession or industry sector, through consultation with its members and with our Office. A good example is the Hong Kong Direct Marketing Association which has developed, in consultation with our Office, "a Code of Practice for the Use of Personal Data in Direct Marketing" for its members to comply with the requirements of the Ordinance.

Complaints Related to Direct Marketing

As at the end of May 1998, 17 months since the commencement of the Ordinance, 374 complaints have been received by our Office and broadly broken down as follows:

  Complaints against Private Sector 253
  Complaints against Public Sector 82
  Complaints against Individual 39
 
  TOTAL: 374

49 complaints (19%) of the 253 complaints against private sector organisations are related to direct marketing, mainly on the absence of the opt-out message, and further contacts with individuals after they have chosen to opt-out. A high percentage of these direct marketing-related complaints are concerned with cold-calls by telephone, particularly by real-estate agents. After discussion with the representative associations of the real estate agencies, our Office issued in November 1997 a "Guidelines on Cold-Calling" emphasising the need to provide an opt-out message during cold-calls, and to effectively maintain an opt-out list to avoid contravention of the Ordinance.

Public Registers as a Data Source for Direct Marketing

It is recognised that there is a persistent and growing tension in the community regarding the use of publicly available personal information in direct marketing.

While there is no legal definition of "Public Registers" in Hong Kong, in general, they are understood to be records kept by government departments of various "public activities" data of which can be made available to the public usually for a fee. Prominent examples include:

  • The Register of Vehicles
  • The Land Register
  • The Register of Marriages
  • The Companies Register

The traditional approach in drafting laws to establish these registers is to state merely that certain documents or information shall appear on a public register and available for public disclosure. In general, there was little consideration on the privacy of personal data. This leads to a host of privacy problems and public concern. These concerns include:

  1. whether there is a statement of purpose related to data collection in the relevant Ordinance which creates the Register;
  2. whether there is excessive collection of personal data related to the explicit or implicit purposes of collection;
  3. whether there is excessive disclosure of personal data in satisfying the legitimate public searches;
  4. whether there is control on the subsequent use of the information obtained from the registers; and
  5. the use of data obtained from the registers for direct marketing purposes.

While some hold the view that privacy should not be considered as an issue for personal data which are publicly available, there are two major concerns with this view:

  1. Law
    Information from public register is publicly available for certain intended purposes, e.g. marriage notifications containing personal data are exhibited for the purpose of enabling legitimate objections to be made to the impending marriages. To use such personal data for direct marketing can be construed as a change of purpose and, without prescribed consent from the parties concerned, such an action is likely to be in breach of Principle 3 of the data protection principles of the Ordinance.
  2. Public sentiments
    In the latest public opinion survey on privacy conducted in Hong Kong in March 1998, in responding to the question "will current practices cause privacy problems" in relation to the use of the Registers of Vehicles, Land Register and the Register of Marriages, the corresponding answers are 7.9, 7.9 and 7.2 for the respective registers on a scale of 0 - 10 (where 0:no problem at all, 10:very serious problems). The considerable concern shown are related to direct marketing, e.g. mail campaign by marriage services companies or cold calls to property owners by real estate agencies.

In furtherance of personal data protection for the community, various actions should be considered including:

  1. amending the various Ordinances which allow access to information held in relevant public registers by the public, to take into account the requirements of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance;
  2. amending the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance to include specific provisions on public registers;
  3. introducing a generic public registers ordinance governing the establishment, maintenance and use of public registers; and
  4. the creation of a territorial-wide opt-out list enforceable by law.

[Next Page]

Back to top

[Archive]

End of Page


[Media Statement] [Speeches, Articles & Papers] [Exhibition Materials] [Other Related Websites] [Archive] [Other Resources] [On-line Self Training] [Submissions to Public Consultation] [Privacy Commissioner's response following former Deputy Commissioner's conviction] [Response to the loss of medical data by Department of Health] [Privacy Commissioner commits himself to securing patients' data] [Privacy Commissioner commences inspection against Hospital Authority] [Response to data leakage by Immigration Department] [Response to data loss by HSBC] [Privacy is Your Business International Privacy Video Competition] [Privacy Commissioner strives to promote protection of personal data privacy] [Response following former Deputy Commissioner's conviction] [The Privacy Commissioner's clarification on criminalizing data leakage] [The Privacy Commissioner responds to media report today that] [Response to data leakage by the Police] [Progress of Inspection Against Hospital Authority] [The Director of Immigration Department signed formal undertaking] [Speech by Privacy Commissioner at the special meeting of Legislative Council Panel on Home Affairs] [Response to data loss incidents by The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited] [The Privacy Commissioner completes the Inspection of the Hospital Authority's Personal Data System] [Privacy Commissioner Publishes Inspection Report on Hospital Authority] [Privacy Commissioner explains recommendations on the protection of patients' data privacy] [Privacy Commissioner accepts an Undertaking by HSBC] [Privacy is Your Business International Privacy Video Competition Prize Presentation Ceremony] [Response to Judgment of judicial review application by Cathay Pacific] [Privacy Commissioner welcomes HA's effort to enhance patient data privacy] [Statement by the Privacy Commissioner Following the Judgment made in HCAL 50/2008] [PCPD received a letter from CX Flight Attendants Union] [Impact of Technology on Data Privacy] [Privacy Commissioner responds to taxi industry's proposal of installing CCTVs in taxis] [United Christian Hospital's loss of patients' data] [Privacy Commissioner hosts the 31st APPA Forum] [Privacy Commissioner urges job seekers to be careful when providing personal data] [Launch of a booklet on protection of personal data] [Investigation Report: Employer Collecting Employees' Fingerprint Data for Attendance Purpose] [The Recruitment of Deputy Privacy Commissioner (DPC)] [Response to Media Report on the Use of Fingerprint Recognition System by a School] [Privacy Commissioner Responds to Public Enquiries about the Issue of] [Investigation Report: Tutorial Centre Using a Student's Results Notice for Promotion without the Student's Consent] [Privacy Commissioner Welcomes Hospital Authority's New Measures on the Protection of Patients' Personal Data] [Investigation Report: Food Company Collecting Participants' Personal Data in Lucky Draw Activity] [Privacy Commissioner Responds to] [The need to ensure that individuals are identified by the correct personal identifiers: the case of identification of new born babies] [Public Consultation on Ordinance Review] [] [Response to Media Report on Searching for Others' Personal Data on the Internet] [Privacy Commissioner attended the 31st International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners] [Response to Media Enquiries] [The "Value-for-money" Audit Report on PCPD issued by the Director of AuditThe] [Protective measures taken by the Hospital Authority which enhance the protection of new born babies and the accuracy of their personal data] [The Privacy Commissioner issued two investigation reports on data access request fee charged by data users and the proper handling of personal data transferred by data users to their debt collection agency] [A personal statement by Roderick Woo, the Privacy Commissioner] [Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data's Annual Report won international awards for three consecutive years] [Privacy Commissioner Launches Privacy Awareness Week 2010] [Response to recent discussion about third parties' requests for patients data] [Opinion Survey: Senior Citizens' Attitudes and Perceptions towards Personal Data Privacy] [Public Seminar on] [Privacy Campaign for Insurers] [Google collected Wi-Fi data] [Google collected Wi-Fi data in Hong Kong] [Google collected Wi-Fi data in Hong Kong] [Privacy Commissioner attended the 33rd Asia Pacific Privacy Authorities Forum] [Privacy Commissioner responds to a local magazine's editorial on privacy issues] [Privacy Commissioner Publishes Guidance Note on Data Breach Handling and the Giving of Breach Notifications] [Privacy Commissioner responds to an opinion survey report on Octopus cards and privacy issues] [Privacy Commissioner's Finding against HSBC was set aside by the Administrative Appeals Board] [The Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance and Octopus Card System] [Privacy Commissioner initiates investigation on the Octopus] [Privacy Commissioner Publishes Information Leaflet on Privacy Impact Assessment] [Privacy Commissioner published new revised edition of a book to provide in-depth interpretation] [The Privacy Commissioner gives interim report on the investigation of Octopus] [The Privacy Commissioner Completed the Compliance Check on Google's Collection of Wi-Fi Payload Data] [The Privacy Commissioner has completed a Privacy Compliance Assessment Report on the Smart Identity Card System] [Collection of Visitors' Fingerprint Data by a Theme Park] [Investigation Report: Beauty Centre Transferring a Client's Personal Data to a Third Party without the Client's Consent] [Hong Kong Letter - Roderick Woo, Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data] [Mr. Allan Chiang took office as Privacy Commissioner] [A short video introducing the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance] [Privacy Commissioner reminds data users of the requirements of the Ordinance when engaging direct marketing activities] [PCPD joined APEC Cross-border Privacy Enforcement Arrangement] [Privacy Commissioner discussed organizations’ collection and use of personal data for direct marketing with a political commentary group] [Amended Data Access Request Form takes effect] [Response to media reports on the attendance records of the Personal Data (Privacy) Advisory Committee] [Privacy Commissioner completed investigation on Octopus Holdings Ltd] [Multi-media Information] [Investigation Report – Octopus Rewards Program] [Privacy Commissioner publishes Guidance on the Collection and Use of Personal Data in Direct Marketing] [Privacy Commissioner responds to Government's proposals on Review of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance] [PCPD's Statement regarding investigations into the Octopus Group of Companies] [Hong Kong Letter - Allan Chiang, Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data] [Investigation Report: A Telecommunications Company Authorized Another Company to Conduct Telemarketing] [A Personal Statement by Mr. Allan CHIANG in response to media reports on his handling of a personal data privacy case when he was Postmaster General in 2005] [A Personal Statement by Mr. Allan CHIANG in response to media reports on his handling of personal data privacy cases when he was Postmaster General from 2003 to 2006] [Online Survey of the] [PCPD's Submission in response to Report on Public Consultation on Review of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance] [The Sharing of Mortgage Data for Credit Assessment] [Public Forum on Proposed Revisions to the Code of Practice on Consumer Credit Data] [Privacy concerns about resumption of Google Street View car operation] [Public Consultation on the Sharing of Mortgage Data for Credit Assessment Ended] [Consumer Roadshow on Protection of Personal Data] [Consultation Report on the Sharing of Mortgage Data for Credit Assessment] [Amendments to Code of Practice on Consumer Credit Data To Take Effect]


[About PCPD] [The Ordinance] [PCPD Activities] [Information Centre] [Personal Data Privacy Liberal Studies] [Privacy Zone for Youngsters]
[Publications & Videos] [Enquiries & Complaints] [Case Notes] [Contact Us] [Search] [Site Directory] [Graphical Version]
[Chinese Version]


Notice/Copyright 2001 Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, Hong Kong. All rights reserved. Disclaimer