Information Centre

Privacy Commissioner issues consultation document on proposed provisions on consumer credit data protection in relation to the sharing of positive credit data

 
Date: 28 August 2002
Privacy Commissioner issues consultation document on proposed provisions on consumer credit data protection in relation to the sharing of positive credit data
 

The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, Mr Raymond Tang, today issues a consultation document to seek the public's views on a set of proposed provisions on consumer credit data protection in relation to the financial industry's  proposal on the sharing of positive credit data.  The industry's proposal suggests relaxation to certain provisions of the Code of Practice on Consumer Credit Data ("The Code") as a measure to contribute towards alleviating the problem of growing consumer indebtedness and personal bankruptcies.

"There are issues arising from the proposal that are of concern to consumers.  Consumer's credit information is personal and private to the individual concerned and therefore sharing of positive consumer credit data gives rise to significant impact in terms of personal data privacy.  However, privacy interests do not assume supremacy over all other societal interests.  We have to face the fact that bankruptcy is a real problem with serious social and economic implications for Hong Kong.  In considering the industry's proposal, a fair and reasonable balance has to be struck between public interest and privacy interest of the individual," Tang says.

The Code first took effect on 27 November 1998.  It regulates the use of recorded information relating to an individual's credit transactions consistent with the requirements of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance ("The Ordinance").

The current provisions of the Code provide a framework for the sharing of consumer credit data in terms of account default, credit application, file activities and public record.

Over the past eighteen months, the default rate on loans and credit card spending has risen considerably.  The financial services industry, members of the Legislative Council and the public in general have expressed concerns over the trend of rising personal bankruptcies, in particular multiple delinquencies evident in credit card holders' failure to make repayments.  The Law Reform Commission has also commented on the situation in the context of debt collection practices.

In January 2002, the Government announced a high-level Roundtable Discussion amongst industry representatives and government officials to find ways to tackle the problem.  The Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data was invited to participate in the discussions.  The industry proposed to introduce a greater sharing of positive credit data via a credit reference agency as one of the measures to improve the current consumer-lending environment.  In June 2002, the Privacy Commissioner's Office set up a working group to study the industry's proposal.

"There are many factors contributing to the rising level of bankruptcy, which has significant social as well as economic impacts.  We do not regard the proposal for greater sharing of credit data as a cure for this problem but believe that credit information transparency benefits both credit providers and borrowers in facilitating an efficient credit environment and promoting a responsible lending/borrowing relationship.  Prudent lending policy, coupled with proper use of borrower's credit information could safeguard against over-extension of credit to those individuals who do not have sufficient repayment ability," Tang says.

"Co-operation and concerted efforts of all participants in the consumer credit market are necessary to tackle the problem.  From a public interest perspective, there is a disclosure obligation on the part of the borrower when he accesses market facilities to enable prudent lending to be exercised.  On the other hand, a credit provider has a responsibility to the market in terms of prudent credit assessment and an obligation to the borrower when using his data in accordance with the requirements of the Ordinance.  Moreover, fair and equal access to credit data also contributes towards a level playing field in the consumer credit market," Tang adds.

 "From a privacy perspective, the challenge is to ensure that information shared is necessary and not excessive for the purpose of prudent lending.  The scope of new credit data to be shared is therefore limited to the individual's current exposure, such as number of facilities, credit limits, outstanding amounts and monthly repayment record, other than residential mortgage loan.  Personal information such as personal income, deposits, other assets, and non-credit related information should not be shared," Tang says.

If the proposal is adopted after consultation, a credit report available to a lender may display a borrower's repayment record during the past 24 months.  Such repayment record may also be used to provide a credit score on the borrower.  Credit data to be used for the purpose of supporting consumer credit scoring model will be limited to the most recent 5 years.

When a loan account is terminated with full repayment with no default record exceeding 90 days during the most recent 5 years, the borrower is given an "opt-out" choice to decide whether he would allow the credit provider to continue sharing the repayment record data of the closed account.  This ensures that the borrower regains his privacy rights over the use of his credit data when he has fulfilled all his borrowing obligations without default.

Safeguards and restrictions are put in place to ensure consumers' personal data privacy is maintained.  The credit reference agency is required to implement a log record system for audit checking purposes and conduct investigation in case of any suspected abnormal access.  As a matter of good practice, the agency is also recommended to submit an independent compliance audit annually at its own expense.

"In light of the impact the implementation may have upon the data privacy interests of existing customers, a transition period of twenty-four months would be enforced, in which new positive data would be allowed for use in handling new credit applications only.  This would also ensure that a reliable picture of borrowers' repayment profiles would be established from the new data during the period prior to their use in considering renewal or review of credit facilities," Tang says.

"We are seeking the public's views to ensure that a proper balance between the broader public interest and privacy interest of the individual is struck whilst making credit assessment more efficient and rigorous," Tang concludes.

The public consultation period on the amendments to the Code will commence today for eight weeks.  Interested parties are invited to send their comments in writing to the Privacy Commissioner's Office by 25 October 2002.  Copies of the consultation paper are available at the Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data at Unit 2001, 20th Floor, Office Tower, Convention Plaza, 1 Harbour Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong; or at Public Enquiry Centres of district offices.  The consultation paper is also available on the PCPD website at http://www.pcpd.org.hk. 
 
 
 

 

Back to top

[Image of Back][Image of Archive]

End of Page


[Media Statement] [Speeches, Articles & Papers] [Exhibition Materials] [Other Related Websites] [Archive] [Other Resources] [On-line Self Training] [Submissions to Public Consultation] [Privacy Commissioner's response following former Deputy Commissioner's conviction] [Response to the loss of medical data by Department of Health] [Privacy Commissioner commits himself to securing patients' data] [Privacy Commissioner commences inspection against Hospital Authority] [Response to data leakage by Immigration Department] [Response to data loss by HSBC] [Privacy is Your Business International Privacy Video Competition] [Privacy Commissioner strives to promote protection of personal data privacy] [Response following former Deputy Commissioner's conviction] [The Privacy Commissioner's clarification on criminalizing data leakage] [The Privacy Commissioner responds to media report today that] [Response to data leakage by the Police] [Progress of Inspection Against Hospital Authority] [The Director of Immigration Department signed formal undertaking] [Speech by Privacy Commissioner at the special meeting of Legislative Council Panel on Home Affairs] [Response to data loss incidents by The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited] [The Privacy Commissioner completes the Inspection of the Hospital Authority's Personal Data System] [Privacy Commissioner Publishes Inspection Report on Hospital Authority] [Privacy Commissioner explains recommendations on the protection of patients' data privacy] [Privacy Commissioner accepts an Undertaking by HSBC] [Privacy is Your Business International Privacy Video Competition Prize Presentation Ceremony] [Response to Judgment of judicial review application by Cathay Pacific] [Privacy Commissioner welcomes HA's effort to enhance patient data privacy] [Statement by the Privacy Commissioner Following the Judgment made in HCAL 50/2008] [PCPD received a letter from CX Flight Attendants Union] [Impact of Technology on Data Privacy] [Privacy Commissioner responds to taxi industry's proposal of installing CCTVs in taxis] [United Christian Hospital's loss of patients' data] [Privacy Commissioner hosts the 31st APPA Forum] [Privacy Commissioner urges job seekers to be careful when providing personal data] [Launch of a booklet on protection of personal data] [Investigation Report: Employer Collecting Employees' Fingerprint Data for Attendance Purpose] [The Recruitment of Deputy Privacy Commissioner (DPC)] [Response to Media Report on the Use of Fingerprint Recognition System by a School] [Privacy Commissioner Responds to Public Enquiries about the Issue of] [Investigation Report: Tutorial Centre Using a Student's Results Notice for Promotion without the Student's Consent] [Privacy Commissioner Welcomes Hospital Authority's New Measures on the Protection of Patients' Personal Data] [Investigation Report: Food Company Collecting Participants' Personal Data in Lucky Draw Activity] [Privacy Commissioner Responds to] [The need to ensure that individuals are identified by the correct personal identifiers: the case of identification of new born babies] [Public Consultation on Ordinance Review] [] [Response to Media Report on Searching for Others' Personal Data on the Internet] [Privacy Commissioner attended the 31st International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners] [Response to Media Enquiries] [The "Value-for-money" Audit Report on PCPD issued by the Director of AuditThe] [Protective measures taken by the Hospital Authority which enhance the protection of new born babies and the accuracy of their personal data] [The Privacy Commissioner issued two investigation reports on data access request fee charged by data users and the proper handling of personal data transferred by data users to their debt collection agency] [A personal statement by Roderick Woo, the Privacy Commissioner] [Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data's Annual Report won international awards for three consecutive years] [Privacy Commissioner Launches Privacy Awareness Week 2010] [Response to recent discussion about third parties' requests for patients data] [Opinion Survey: Senior Citizens' Attitudes and Perceptions towards Personal Data Privacy] [Public Seminar on] [Privacy Campaign for Insurers] [Google collected Wi-Fi data] [Google collected Wi-Fi data in Hong Kong] [Google collected Wi-Fi data in Hong Kong] [Privacy Commissioner attended the 33rd Asia Pacific Privacy Authorities Forum] [Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance and the PCPD] [Privacy Commissioner responds to a local magazine's editorial on privacy issues] [Privacy Commissioner Publishes Guidance Note on Data Breach Handling and the Giving of Breach Notifications] [Privacy Commissioner responds to an opinion survey report on Octopus cards and privacy issues] [Privacy Commissioner's Finding against HSBC was set aside by the Administrative Appeals Board] [The Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance and Octopus Card System] [Privacy Commissioner initiates investigation on the Octopus] [Privacy Commissioner Publishes Information Leaflet on Privacy Impact Assessment] [Privacy Commissioner published new revised edition of a book to provide in-depth interpretation] [The Privacy Commissioner gives interim report on the investigation of Octopus] [The Privacy Commissioner Completed the Compliance Check on Google's Collection of Wi-Fi Payload Data] [The Privacy Commissioner has completed a Privacy Compliance Assessment Report on the Smart Identity Card System] [Collection of Visitors' Fingerprint Data by a Theme Park] []


[About PCPD] [The Ordinance] [Review of the Ordinance] [PCPD Activities] [Information Centre] [Privacy Zone for Youngsters]
[Publications & Videos] [Enquiries & Complaints] [Case Notes] [Contact Us] [Search] [Site Directory] [Graphical Version]
[Chinese Version]


Notice/Copyright 2001 Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, Hong Kong. All rights reserved. Disclaimer