PCO Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, Hong Kong imagebanner image
Privacy Policy StatementSearchSite DirectoryText Only VersionChinese  
image
About PCPD
image
The Ordinance
image
PCPD Activities
image
Information Centreimage
Privacy Zone for Youngsters (Games)
image
Publications and Videos
image
Enquiries and Complaints
image
Case Notes
image
Contact Us
image
Annual ReportCode of Practice & Explanatory BookletConsultation Document/Report
NewsletterGuidance Note & Fact SheetLeaflet & FormOpinion Survey
OthersInvestigation Report / Inspection ReportInformation Book
image

Publications and Videos
Annual Report

 

Legal

image

Response to Consultation Paper on Copyright Protection in the Digital Environment

The Secretary for Commerce, Industry and Technology ("the Secretary") issued a Consultation Paper titled "Copyright Protection in the Digital Environment" in December 2006 ("the Paper") with the objective of reviewing copyright law. In response, the Privacy Commissioner made submissions on, inter alia, the following issues:

(i)

The Paper suggested that a simple, faster and less costly mechanism be provided for the copyright owners to request Internet Access Service Providers ("IASPs") to disclose the identity of their clients allegedly engaged in online copyright infringing activities. The Privacy Commissioner considers that the mere fact that a "quick and inexpensive" alternative will make effective enforcement by a copyright owner is insufficient justification having regard to the privacy intrusion as well as the adverse action that will be taken against the data subject and that such disclosure may not fall within the original or directly related purpose of collection of personal data by the IASPs.

The Privacy Commissioner called for careful consideration by the Secretary especially in view that the Ordinance as it currently stands has provided for exemption where personal data are used for the purpose of "prevention, preclusion or remedying (including punishment) of unlawful or seriously improper conduct" and application of the use limitation principle would be likely to prejudice the purpose. Third party discovery is also available to the copyright owner to apply to court for an order of Norwich Pharmacal relief. Judicial oversight is found to be more effective in safeguarding personal data privacy right and the release of personal data by the IASPs without judicial scrutiny will likely open a floodgate for others requiring IASPs to disclose personal data prejudicing personal data privacy.

(ii) In relation to the suggestion that statutory requirement be imposed for IASPs to keep records of clients' online communications, the Privacy Commissioner drew the attention of the Secretary to the duty imposed upon data users under the Ordinance to erase personal data no longer required for the purpose for which the data were to be used. The retention of communications records to provide evidence for copyright infringement does not fall within the original or directly related purpose of collection. Continual retention of personal data by the IASPs will invariably expose the data to increased risks of unlawful or unauthorized access and use. In addition, it does not accord with international standard. Careful consideration should therefore be given by the Secretary on the retention of personal data by IASPs solely for the purpose of facilitating the gathering of evidence by copyright owners.
(ii) The Paper also suggested that industry guidelines or measures be implemented to facilitate communication between IASPs and copyright owners. The Privacy Commissioner reminded the Secretary that any guidelines or measures implemented should not have the legal effect of overriding the requirements of the Ordinance and must not be used as an instrument compelling disclosure of personal data by the IASPs.

There was no further development on the matter at the end of the reporting period.

 
 

Previous PageTable of ContentsNext Page


  imageNotice/ Copyright 2001 Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, Hong Kong. All rights reserved. Disclaimer