Direct Marketing and Privacy
Related to Personal Data (cont.)
Direct Marketing
Direct marketing is a booming business on a global
basis, and Hong Kong is no exception. While the Hong
Kong consumers are given, and many welcome the opportunities
to choose a wide variety of services and products through
direct marketing channels, there are also increasing
negative sentiments regarding the invasion of privacy
by "unsolicited personally addressed" mail, fax and
phone messages.
There is a provision (Section 34) in the Ordinance
which specifically relates to direct marketing. In essence,
it requires a direct marketer to provide an opt-out
clause in the direct marketing message the first time
an individual is contacted, and to cease further contact
with the individual if the individual chooses to opt-out.
The Commissioner is vested with the power to issue
and approve codes of practice for data users for the
purpose of providing practical guidance in respect of
requirements under the Ordinance. Except in special
circumstances, usually a relevant code of practice is
developed by the recognised representative or regulatory
body of a profession or industry sector, through consultation
with its members and with our Office. A good example
is the Hong Kong Direct Marketing Association which
has developed, in consultation with our Office, "a Code
of Practice for the Use of Personal Data in Direct Marketing"
for its members to comply with the requirements of the
Ordinance.
Complaints Related to
Direct Marketing
As at the end of May 1998, 17 months since the commencement
of the Ordinance, 374 complaints have been received
by our Office and broadly broken down as follows:
| |
Complaints against Private Sector |
253 |
| |
Complaints against Public Sector |
82 |
| |
Complaints against Individual |
39 |
| |
|
| |
TOTAL: |
374 |
49 complaints (19%) of the 253 complaints against private
sector organisations are related to direct marketing,
mainly on the absence of the opt-out message, and further
contacts with individuals after they have chosen to
opt-out. A high percentage of these direct marketing-related
complaints are concerned with cold-calls by telephone,
particularly by real-estate agents. After discussion
with the representative associations of the real estate
agencies, our Office issued in November 1997 a "Guidelines
on Cold-Calling" emphasising the need to provide an
opt-out message during cold-calls, and to effectively
maintain an opt-out list to avoid contravention of the
Ordinance.
Public Registers as a
Data Source for Direct Marketing
It is recognised that there is a persistent and growing
tension in the community regarding the use of publicly
available personal information in direct marketing.
While there is no legal definition of "Public Registers"
in Hong Kong, in general, they are understood to be
records kept by government departments of various "public
activities" data of which can be made available to the
public usually for a fee. Prominent examples include:
- The Register of Vehicles
- The Land Register
- The Register of Marriages
- The Companies Register
The traditional approach in drafting laws to establish
these registers is to state merely that certain documents
or information shall appear on a public register and
available for public disclosure. In general, there was
little consideration on the privacy of personal data.
This leads to a host of privacy problems and public
concern. These concerns include:
- whether there is a statement of purpose related
to data collection in the relevant Ordinance which
creates the Register;
- whether there is excessive collection of personal
data related to the explicit or implicit purposes
of collection;
- whether there is excessive disclosure of personal
data in satisfying the legitimate public searches;
- whether there is control on the subsequent use of
the information obtained from the registers; and
- the use of data obtained from the registers for
direct marketing purposes.
While some hold the view that privacy should not be
considered as an issue for personal data which are publicly
available, there are two major concerns with this view:
- Law
Information from public register is publicly available
for certain intended purposes, e.g. marriage notifications
containing personal data are exhibited for the purpose
of enabling legitimate objections to be made to the
impending marriages. To use such personal data for
direct marketing can be construed as a change of purpose
and, without prescribed consent from the parties concerned,
such an action is likely to be in breach of Principle
3 of the data protection principles of the Ordinance.
- Public sentiments
In the latest public opinion survey on privacy conducted
in Hong Kong in March 1998, in responding to the question
"will current practices cause privacy problems" in
relation to the use of the Registers of Vehicles,
Land Register and the Register of Marriages, the corresponding
answers are 7.9, 7.9 and 7.2 for the respective registers
on a scale of 0 - 10 (where 0:no problem at all, 10:very
serious problems). The considerable concern shown
are related to direct marketing, e.g. mail campaign
by marriage services companies or cold calls to property
owners by real estate agencies.
In furtherance of personal data protection for the
community, various actions should be considered including:
- amending the various Ordinances which allow access
to information held in relevant public registers by
the public, to take into account the requirements
of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance;
- amending the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance to
include specific provisions on public registers;
- introducing a generic public registers ordinance
governing the establishment, maintenance and use of
public registers; and
- the creation of a territorial-wide opt-out list
enforceable by law.
