|
The Privacy
Commissioner met the Commissioner of Police on the series of online
leakages of personal data via peer-to-peer application by the Hong Kong
Police
1. The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, Mr.
Roderick B Woo (“the Privacy Commissioner”) today (7 December) paid a
visit to the Commissioner of Police in order to gain a better
understanding of the problem concerning the series of reported
incidents of online data leakage through the file sharing software. Together they discussed the available options to
strengthen the protection of personal data, including the control of
access and use of personal data by police officers outside workplaces
and the provision of secure IT environment for handling personal data.
2. “Personal data collected by the Police in
discharge of its law enforcement duties are often sensitive in nature
as they may be associated with the investigation of crimes. A
high duty of care is expected of the Police in protecting the personal
data privacy of individuals especially in connection with the
information obtained from suspects or from witnesses to ensure that
accidental or unauthorized access are minimized. This is
important not only in terms of protecting personal data privacy but
also for the maintenance of the public’s confidence in the Police’s
investigative process.” Mr. Woo said.
3. Data Protection Principle 4 (DPP4) of Schedule 1
of the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (“the Ordinance”) provides
that a data user shall take practicable steps to ensure that personal
data held by him are protected against unauthorized or accidental
access, processing, erasure or other use having particular regard to
any measures taken for ensuring the integrity, prudence and competence
of persons having access to the data.
4. The Commissioner of Police acknowledged that as at
4 December 2009, there have been a total of 28 personal data leakage
incidents that were caused by some staff inadvertently saving copies of
Police documents as templates for future use in personal computers at
home, which had installed peer-to-peer application. The leakage
was not caused by hacking or the failure of the IT system of the
Police. He maintained that all practicable steps have been taken
to ensure due protection of personal data in the hands of the Police.
5. The Commissioner of Police added that there might
be further online spread of these personal data but he maintained that
it could be a manifestation of the leakages originated from previous
online data security breaches.
6. In the meantime, the Privacy Commissioner is
satisfied that the Police has taken the following measures to mitigate
the harm to the affected individuals and to prevent reoccurrence:
i) the affected persons have been notified so that
they can stay alert.
ii) Investigation with 26 of the incidents have been
completed. A total of 21 police officers had been disciplined.
iii) a sanitization exercise to rid all Police common
terminals of classified and /or personal data was completed in July
2008. A second round sanitization exercise was carried out in February
2009 to further ensure compliance.
iv) 2,800 USB thumb drives with e-Cert encryption
were introduced in February 2009 for all inspectorate officers or above
for the secure storage and transmission of classified data.
v) its staff have been reminded of the risk of using
peer-to-peer applications and how such applications can be removed from
their computers. In addition, a series of
seminars/workshops/briefings on information security had been
conducted, in which the risk of peer-to-peer applications were
identified.
vi) internal cyber patrols are continuing its efforts
to prevent reoccurrence of data leakage incident.
7. The Privacy Commissioner is currently
investigating into the series of cases of data leakage cases involving
the Police and is focusing on the specific cause of leakage in each of
these cases. Mr. Woo said “I shall have to consider in due course
whether to commence an inspection of the data security system run by
the Hong Kong Police in relation to the handling of personal data by
its officers outside their normal workplaces with a view to making
recommendations to assist the Commissioner of Police to better comply
with the requirements of the Ordinance and to reduce the likelihood of
recurrence of these incidents. The resources and manpower
constraint may however affect my decision.”
8. Members of the public who are affected by the data
leakage may lodge complaints to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner
for Personal Data (“the PCPD”) if they wish. The PCPD will
provide all necessary assistance to the complainants with regard to
individual circumstances. In addition, the Personal Data
(Privacy) Ordinance provides that any person who suffers damage,
including injury to feelings, from a contravention of the requirement
under the Ordinance shall be entitled to compensation from the
responsible data user.
END
|