Privacy
Commissioner's statement
In response to IPCC’s press release, the Commissioner would like to
make the following statements:-
(a) The
Commissioner notes the IPCC's assertions that he "failed to consider
whether the Government was the data user in relation to the
leakage incident” and that he "avoided this issue and sought to place
the burden as a matter of convenience on the Council." According
to its web-site, the IPCC represents itself as an independent advisory council
appointed by the Chief Executive to monitor and review investigations
by CAPO of complaints made against the Police by the public. The
major function of its secretariat was stated to be to examine all
complaint investigation reports submitted by CAPO in detail to ensure
that each and every case is investigated in a thorough and impartial
manner before recommending them to IPCC members for
endorsement. The IPCC secretariat exists solely to assist
the IPCC, which prides itself to be independent of the Government, to
discharge its role and function. The Commissioner at no time has
any doubt that the relevant data user in the incident is the IPCC
(comprising the Council members and the secretariat) and not the
Government.
(b) The IPCC
stated that "[t]he Commissioner adverted to correspondence with
the Secretariat which were copied to the Chairman of the
Council." This statement is misleading in that it tends to give
the public a false impression that the Commissioner had been in
correspondence with the secretariat rather than the Council or its
Chairman during the investigation. In truth, all the
Commissioner's letters were addressed to the Chairman of IPCC or
IPCC. The reply letters were invariably signed by the Secretary
of the IPCC on behalf of the IPCC and copied to its Chairman.
This very fact shows that the secretariat works for or under the
instructions of the Chairman or the Council.
(c) The
other issues raised in the IPCC's press release have been addressed in
the Commissioner's Report and/or the earlier media release today.
(d) The
Commissioner has published the result of his investigation. If
the IPCC feels aggrieved by the decision of the Commissioner, there is
legal recourse available to it.
|